Category: AEQ

  • ontsle

    [et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses Hero” _builder_version=”3.22″ use_background_color_gradient=”on” background_color_gradient_start=”#474ab6″ background_color_gradient_end=”#9271f6″ background_image=”http://chan.higher-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/coding-background-texture.jpg” background_blend=”overlay” custom_padding=”144px|0px|146px|0px||” animation_style=”slide” animation_direction=”top” animation_intensity_slide=”2%” locked=”off”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|||” custom_width_px=”1280px”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ header_font=”|on|||” header_font_size=”42px” header_line_height=”1.3em” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” text_orientation=”center” background_layout=”dark” max_width=”530px” module_alignment=”center” custom_padding=”|||” hover_enabled=”0″ header_font_size_tablet=”” header_font_size_phone=”” header_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” locked=”off” sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Service-Learning

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses” _builder_version=”3.22″ custom_padding=”0px|0px|100px|0px”][et_pb_row column_structure=”3_4,1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”46px|||||”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Focus:
    Service-learning, a community-based approach to teaching and learning, provides opportunities for students to discover linkages between theory and practice in authentic settings. Educational research and practice have provided numerous examples of service-learning as a tool for ‘expanding the walls’ of the traditional classroom, providing opportunities for active and cooperative learning, interdisciplinary projects, and multicultural experiences grounded in local community issues that enliven the teaching/learning processes. Many of the studies on student outcomes indicate that the combination of service with learning enhances student development, multicultural awareness and academic achievement. This special issue invites researchers and practitioners to submit articles and essays on service-learning in higher education with a special focus on the individual and institutional impacts of established service-learning programs. Qualitative and quantitative studies that can contribute to the growing knowledge base on the potential of this teaching/learning strategy are especially welcome. Other issues to be addressed include assessment and evaluation, social justice concerns, and the mission of the university in 21st century society.

    Who Should Submit:
    Higher education faculty, graduate students and staff with experience planning/designing/implementing and researching service-learning projects; K-12 teachers with service-learning background. Please identify your submission with keyword: SERVICE

    Submission deadline:
    any time until the end of May 2008; see details for other deadline options like early, regular, and short.

    Submission Procedure:

    http://rapidintellect.com/AEQweb/rufen1.htm
    or
    https://higher-ed.org/AEQ/rufen1.htm
    PROMO
     
    K-12 Service-Learning List
    k12-sl@lists.etr.org
    
    Higher Education Service-Learning List
    he-sl@lists.etr.org 
    
    Service-Learning List
    sl@csf.colorado.edu 
    
    ADVCOM@LISTSERV.AED.ORG
    Transmitting an Ethic of Service-Learning 
    ADVCOM@LISTSERV2.AED.ORG
    Transmitting an Ethic of Service-Learning 
    BDD@LISTSERV.AED.ORG 
    Transmitting an Ethic of Service-Learning 
    CANADIAN-SERVICE-LEARNING@LISTSERV.UOGUELPH.CA 
    professional staff & faculty sharing information 
    CBCOM@LISTSERV2.AED.ORG 
    Transmitting an Ethic of Service-Learning  
    CBO-SL@LISTSERV.POINTSOFLIGHT.ORG 
    Community-Based Organization Service-Learning 
    COMCOM@LISTSERV.AED.ORG 
    Transmitting an Ethic of Service-Learning  
    FBCOM@LISTSERV2.AED.ORG 
    Transmitting an Ethic of Service-Learning  
    KNOWCOM@LISTSERV2.AED.ORG 
    Transmitting an Ethic of Service-Learning 
    MCBCOM@LISTSERV.AED.ORG 
    Transmitting an Ethic of Service-Learning 
    NSLCK-12@TC.UMN.EDU 
    K-12 Service-Learning Nationwide 
    NSLPEXCOM@LISTSERV2.AED.ORG 
    Transmitting an Ethic of Service-Learning 
    RESCOM@LISTSERV.AED.ORG
    Transmitting an Ethic of Service-Learning 
    SERLEARN@LISTSERV.CMICH.EDU
    service-learning 
    SERVICE-LEARNING@LISTSERV.TAMU.EDU 
    Those interested in Service-Learning at Texas A&M.; 
    SERVICELEARNING@KSU.EDU 
    Service-Learning 
    SERVICELEARNING@LISTSERV.KSU.EDU
    Service-Learning 
    SIL@LISTSERV2.AED.ORG 
    Service-Learning Initiative 
    STEERING@LISTSERV2.AED.ORG 
    Service-Learning Initiative Steering
    WV_SERVICE-LEARNING@WVNVM.WVNET.EDU 
    WV Service-Learning Discussion 
    listserv@listserv.syr.edu
    	K-12 Administrators
    http://www.teachers.net/mailrings
    	Teachers
    listserv@asu.edu 
    	American Educational Research Association List
    Education Policy Analysis Symposium 
    edpolicy-request@asu.edu
    Education Policy Analysis Forum 
    edpolyan-request@asu.edu
    Educational Research List 
    erl-l-request@asu.edu
    
    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
  • monex

    [et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses Hero” _builder_version=”3.22″ use_background_color_gradient=”on” background_color_gradient_start=”#474ab6″ background_color_gradient_end=”#9271f6″ background_image=”http://chan.higher-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/coding-background-texture.jpg” background_blend=”overlay” custom_padding=”144px|0px|146px|0px||” animation_style=”slide” animation_direction=”top” animation_intensity_slide=”2%” locked=”off”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|||” custom_width_px=”1280px”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ header_font=”|on|||” header_font_size=”42px” header_line_height=”1.3em” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” text_orientation=”center” background_layout=”dark” max_width=”530px” module_alignment=”center” custom_padding=”|||” hover_enabled=”0″ header_font_size_tablet=”” header_font_size_phone=”” header_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” locked=”off” sticky_enabled=”0″]

    R e a d e r s’ C h o i c e

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses” _builder_version=”3.22″ custom_padding=”0px|0px|100px|0px”][et_pb_row column_structure=”3_4,1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”46px|||||”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]

    AEQ Exchange, calculations below are based on hits/visitors received by articles archived on this page. Rankings, updated bimonthly (as of May 2007), reflect accumulated hits from time of posting until the current month, not-to-exceed-24-month-limit, two-year-period. Top Ten Articles display in bold number of hits/visitors. For rankings to be listed, minimum 500 hits is required. Updates recorded monthly in 50 hits increments. Two-year-period results are noted at the end of this listing.

    • 2008
    • 2007
      • October – PBL
        1. ooooo The Design Process of Problem Solving Full text
        2. ooooo Problem-based Learning in the Study of Literature Full text
      • August – MULTIMEDIA
        1. oo550 Multimedia Integration in Online Courses Full text
        2. oo500 Media Richness & Individual Perceptions of Teams Full text
      • June – MEDIA
        1. oo500 Media Literacy and Student/Teacher Engagement Full text
      • April – ONLINE
        1. oo500 Virtual Design Based Research Full text
        2. oo900 Assessing Effective Online Instruction Sites Full text
        3. oo850 On-Line Courses: Recommendations for Teachers Full text
      • March – POLITICAL
        1. oo550 Exploring Political Science’s Signature Pedagogy Full text
        2. oo850 Thank You for Smoking: Learning about Politics Full text
        3. oo500 Competition in Political Science Pedagogy Full text
      • February – HEALTH
        1. oo800 Service-Learning in healthcare education Full text
        2. oo650 Teaching about HIV/AIDS through Online Education Full text
        3. o1050 What do Adolescents Know about Health? Full text
      • January – MEDIA
        1. o2050 Media Literacy: (Mis) Shaping Women’s Sports Full text
        2. o1650 Channel One and Effectiveness of Media Literacy Full text
        3. o1800 Shifting Currents in Media Awareness Full text
    • 2006
      • December – STUDENT
        1. oo900 Perceptions of Web-mediated Peer Assessment Full text
        2. o1500 Student Attitudes About Classroom Internet Use Full text
        3. oo800 Hate Speech: Implications for Administrators Full text
      • November – ADJUNCT
        1. oo850 Adjuncts Happen: Strong Faculty; Weak System Full text
        2. ooooo The Use and Abuse of Adjunct Faculty in Theology Full text
        3. oo750 Online Adjunct Faculty: Issues & Opportunities Full text
      • October – SERVICE
        1. o1250 The Study of Service-Learning as a Moral Matter Full text
        2. ooooo Service Learning Abroad and Global Citizenship Full text
        3. oo700 A Search for Reciprocity: Service and Learning Full text
      • September – NOVEL
        1. oo950 Subversion: Teaching a Blue Novel in a Red State Full text
        2. o1100 Teaching the Hypertext Novel Full text
        3. ooooo English Literature and Arab Students Full text
      • August – LANGUAGE
        1. o1250 Married Women’s Address Forms Variation in China Full text
        2. oo850 Standards in Internet-Based Newspaper Project Full text
        3. oo850 Text Appropriation: Spirituality and Pedagogy Full text
      • July – SELF
        1. o1400 SRL Enhancing Narratives: Testas’ (Mis)adventures Full text
        2. o1350 Self-Regulation in a Computer Literacy Course Full text
        3. o1550 Self-Regulation through Reflective Practice Full text
      • June – PBL
        1. Sorry, none available. Topic cancelled.
      • May – EFFICACY
        1. oo950 Science Teaching Efficacy Beliefs Full text
        2. o1350 What Predicts Student Teacher Self-Efficacy? Full text
        3. o1750 Efficacy and identification of professional self Full text
      • April – ASSESSMENT
        1. oo850 Perceptions of Web-mediated Peer Assessment Full text
        2. ooooo Peer Assessment and Role Play: A Winning Alliance Full text
        3. oo700 Reading Journals: a versatile assessment strategy Full text
      • March – RESEARCH
        1. oo700 The Promise of Action Research Full text
        2. oo600 Teaching Research Rhetorically Full text
        3. oo500 Empowering Adult Students through Action Research Full text
      • February – RELIGION
        1. oo850 Divinity and Femininity Issues in Counseling Full text
        2. oo900 Down-To-Earth Religious Education Full text
        3. o1150 Introducing Islam Through Qur’anic Recitation Full text
      • January – SCHOLARSHIP
        1. o6300 Teaching More Than You Know Full text
        2. o2250 Benefits of Writing with Students Full text
        3. o4150 Lifelong Learning: A Stratagem for New Teachers Full text
    • 2005
      • December – TECHNOLOGY
        1. oo800 Faculty Technology Training: Learning Objects Full text
        2. oo700 Assistive Technology: A Collaborative Approach Full text
        3. ooooo Making a Civic Investment through Technology Full text
      • November – keyword: CURRICULUM
        1. oo750 AgriProp: Ecological Propaganda Full text
        2. oo650 Media Literacy in Journalism Education Curriculum Full text
        3. ooooo Curriculum Ideas for Part Time PhD Students Full text
      • October – keyword: STUDENT
        1. o4400 Student Goal Orientation and Formative Assessment Full text
        2. o2200 Intergroup Perception of International Students Full text
        3. o3400 Students Perception On E-Learning: A Case-Study Full text
      • September – keyword: LEADERSHIP
        1. o3500 Leadership Preparation in Dangerous Times Full text
        2. o3350 Leader as Teacher: Conversations to Grow Teams Full text
        3. o2000 Teaching Teachers to Lead: Some Lessons Full text
      • August – keyword: ALTERNATIVE
        1. o6550 Genres and Library Skills: A Topical Approach Full text
        2. o5350 Expanding Library Instruction to the Web Portal Full text
        3. o5400 Crisis in Information Literacy Full text
      • July – keyword: SERVICE
        1. o1150 Closing the Digital Divide with Service-Learning Full text
        2. oo500 Using Linked Courses to Scale Institutional Walls Full text
        3. o1050 Relevance of Service-Learning in College Courses Full text
      • June – keyword: MANAGEMENT
        1. oo750 Global Management Education via the Internet Full text
        2. o1000 Ethics and Community in Management Education Full text
        3. oo750 Strategically Increasing Faculty Productivity Full text

    Two-year-period results for SUBJECT specific frequently-read-articles, number of hits/visitors to the left of each title.
    Top ten two-year-period Readers’ Choice articles are in bold.

    2005/2007 May - GENDER
    	- o7300 Case Study: The Color Purple on the Whiteboard Full text
    	- o5600 Classroom Controversy: Christianity and Gay Rights  Full text
    	- o4350 The Relationship of Math Anxiety and Gender  Full text
    
    2005/2007 April - CONSULT
    	- o3750 Consulting and Collaborative Writing Connections  Full text
    	- o3650 Enhancing Consensus-Building through Technology Full text
    	- ooooo Mutual Benefits of Teacher/Scientist Partnerships  Full text
    
    2005/2007 March - ONLINE
    	- o6550 Preparing to Teach Online  Full text
    	- o6050 Weblogs and the “Middle Space” for Learning  Full text
    	- o5100 Realistic Course Previews for Online Students  Full text
    
    2005/2007 February - CULTURE
    	- o4850 The Consequences of Getting it White  Full text
    	- o2300 Literature and International Relations: The Challenges of Interdisciplinarity  Full text
    	- o1750 Literature in an Interdisciplinary Science Seminar   Full text
    
    2005/2007 January - BILINGUAL
    	- o9000 Study of Bilingual Chinese/English Children's Code Switching Behavior  Full text
    	- o5150 Bilingual Information Literacy and Academic Readiness  Full text
    	- o4250 Using Story Re-tell in Bilingual assessment  Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 December -  LANGUAGE
    	- o2700 Designing Instructional Technology for Language Learning Full text
    	- o2250 Grammar for Teachers: Attitudes and Aptitudes Full text
    	- o1200 The Four Basic Principles of Grammar Full text
    	- oo850 English-Use Anxiety in Israeli College Libraries  Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 November - COMMUNITY
    	- o4500 Literature Facilitates Content-Based Instruction  Full text
    	- o1850 Creating Resources for Community College Staff  Full text
    	- o1650 Student Co-Researchers  Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 October - READING
    	- o2250 Reflecting on Miscues in Content Area Readings  Full text
    	- o1200 Helping Linguistic Minorities Read Independently  Full text
    	- o4350 Beyond Research: Improving How We Improve Reading  Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 September - HISTORY
    	- o8500 Dramatic History or Historical Drama?  Full text
    	- o7900 Henry V, the Gulf War, and Cultural Materialism  Full text
    	- o5600 The Great War in the Classroom (on-line simulation of World War I)  Full text
    	- o3250 Teaching Needham’s Puzzle - Fostering Historical Thinking  Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 August - SPECIAL
    	- o2800 Increasing Awareness ...of Students with Disabilities  Full text
    	- o2350 Dyslexia: the ethics of assessment  Full text
    	- o1450 Assessing ... Curricula for Students with ...Disabilities  Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 July - NOVEL & FICTION
    	- o6200 Teaching Between the Genres Full text
    	- o4000 Using the WWW for Classroom-Based Literature Seminars Full text
    	- o3350 Teaching Multiple Approaches to a Single Novel Full text
    	- o2600 Literature in the Modern Language Syllabus Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 June - WRITING
    	- o3650 The Journey Out:  Conceptual Mapping and Writing Process  Full text
    	- o3050 Social Issues in First-year College Writing Full text
    	- o2550 Teaching Conflict through Multiple Rhetorical Stances   Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 May - INFOLIT
    	- o7050 Enticing Faculty to Library Instruction Workshops  Full text
    	- o6950 A Collaborative Approach to Information Literacy in...  Full text
    	- o6350 Paths to Understanding  Full text
    	- o6150 Enhancing Information Literacy: A Practical Exemplar  Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 April - SECONDARY
    	- o8700 Opera as an Intervention  for Rural Public School Children  Full text
    	- o5000 Technology Professional Development: A Case Study  Full text
    	- o3700 It’s About Time! Lengthen Student Writing  Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 March - ASSESSMENT
    	- o8300 Collaborative Testing and Test Performance  Full text
    	- o8050 Assessing Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning ...  Full text
    	- o4200 Collaborative Action Research to Assess Student Learning ...  Full text
    	- o2250 Developing a Tool For Assessing Writing in a General...  Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 February - HEALTH
    	- o8400 A Web Based Course in Clinical Pharmacology  Full text
    	- o7200 Guidelines for Communicating with our Most Elderly  Full text
    	- o5750 Promoting Health Information Literacy Collaborative...   Full text
    	- o4550 Multi-Discipline, Web-based Healthcare Orientation  Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2004/2006 January - ROTC
    	- 10650 Modified Monopoly: Experiencing Social Class Inequality Full text 
    	- o5250 Academics and Professional Military Education Full text 
    	- o3850 The War College Experience  Full text
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2003/2005 December - MATHEMATICS 
    	- o6500 Teaching Math Effectively to Elementary Students Full text
    	- o2200 African American Male Students’ Perception of a Mathematics Full text 
    	- o1850 The Scholar Project Full text 
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2003/2005 November - RESEARCH 
    	- o5950 Quality Online Education - new research agendas Full text 
    	- o5600 Information Literacy Toolkit: Meeting the Challenge... Full text
    	- o2000 A Case Evaluation in Internet Assisted Laboratory Teaching Full text 
    	- o1150 Peer Debriefing: Who, What, When, Why, How Abstract
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2003/2005 October - STUDENT  
    	- o5850 Doctoral Student Perceptions of Learning to be Reflective...Full text 
    	- o5450 New Professors’ Reflections on the Dissertation Process  Full text 
    	- o1400 The Art and Science of Avoiding the Dissertation Abstract
    	- o1200 the Doctorate: Reflections of a Recent Graduate Abstract
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2003/2005 September - RELIGION
    	- o6200 Moral Values for Public Education  Full text
    	- o4800 Spiritual Growth in the Secular Schools Full text
    	- o1800 Moral Development of the Child and Erotic Songs Abstract
    	- o1050 Outcomes from Catholic Service-Learning Abstract
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles.  
    
    2003/2005 August - MEDIA  
    	- o5750 Applying Film Theory in Teaching Fiction Full text
    	- o3450 Using Literature and Film in Organizational Behavior Full text 
    	- oo600 Using English Feature Films in the Modern World Lit Class Abstract
    	- ooo50 Film as a Medium for Analysis in a Graduate Psychology Course Abstract
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    2003/2005 July - MANAGEMENT
    	- o4800 Service Learning and International Business Education Full text
    	- o3850 Collaboration Between the Library and Business Faculty  Full text 
    	- oo550 Using personality type in the business communication classroom Abstract
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles.  
    
    2003/2005 June - COMMUNITY
    	- o2250 Extending School-to-College Programs to the Community College Full text
    	- oo850 Community College Student Satisfaction with the Online and... Abstract
    	- oo500 Service-learning Brings New Dimension to Courses at MiraCosta Abstract
    	- see Keyword Subject Index for a complete list of titles. 
    
    

     

    • To cite, use print source rather than the above on-line versions which often do not reflect print copy format requirements or text lay-out and pagination.
    • To get print copy of 3-4 articles listed in a given month, send this order form.
    • To read other full-text articles, see Editors’ Choice
    • We welcome links from other websites.
      Anyone can link to Academic Exchange Quarterly without seeking permission from Rapid Intellect Group Inc.
    • Read available Copyright clearance
      1. FREE Electronic version copyright clearance
      2. FREE Teacher copyright clearance
      3. FREE Author manuscript authentication & copyright agreement
    • NOTE: Academic Exchange Quarterly does not accept requests from any fee based clearance service companies
      like Alchemedia, CLA Rapid Clearance Service, Copyright Clearance Center, iCopyright systems, RSiCopyright, etc…
    • Read U.S. Copyright Law

    Copyright © MDCDXCVII – MMVII Academic Exchange Quarterly ISSN 1096-1453

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

  • edchoice

    [et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses Hero” _builder_version=”3.22″ use_background_color_gradient=”on” background_color_gradient_start=”#474ab6″ background_color_gradient_end=”#9271f6″ background_image=”http://chan.higher-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/coding-background-texture.jpg” background_blend=”overlay” custom_padding=”144px|0px|146px|0px||” animation_style=”slide” animation_direction=”top” animation_intensity_slide=”2%” locked=”off”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|||” custom_width_px=”1280px”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ header_font=”|on|||” header_font_size=”42px” header_line_height=”1.3em” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” text_orientation=”center” background_layout=”dark” max_width=”530px” module_alignment=”center” custom_padding=”|||” hover_enabled=”0″ header_font_size_tablet=”” header_font_size_phone=”” header_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” locked=”off” sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Editors’ Choice

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses” _builder_version=”3.22″ custom_padding=”0px|0px|100px|0px”][et_pb_row column_structure=”3_4,1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”46px|||||”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]

    • 2007
      • Fall issue
        1. Technical Writing: Skills and Citizenship Full text
        2. Against Study Abroad: US Mexican Immersion Full text
        3. Contextual Media Literacy Revisited Full text
      • Spring issue
        1. Interrogating Suburbia in The Virgin Suicides Full text
        2. Problem-based Learning in the Study of Literature Full text
        3. Married Women’s Address Forms Variation in China Full text
    • 2006
      • Winter issue
        1. Global Competency: An Interdisciplinary Approach Full text
        2. Emergence of self-regulation among online learners Full text
        3. Thank You for Smoking: Learning about Politics Full text
      • Fall issue
        1. Intergenerational Service-Learning Full text
        2. Environmental Arts in a Theological Context Full text
        3. Media Literacy and Student/Teacher Engagement Full text
      • Spring issue
        1. Citizenship and Service Learning Full text
        2. Reflection and Validity in Qualitative Research Full text
        3. Studying Le Ballon rouge with False Beginners Full text
    • 2005
      • Winter issue
        1. Lit circles, collaboration and student interest Full text
        2. Increasing Self-Efficacy Through Mentoring Full text
        3. Developing Teacher Efficacy through Shared Stories Full text
        4. Seeing and Reading through the Culture of War Full text
      • Fall issue
        1. Media Literacy in Journalism Education Curriculum Full text
        2. “Doing Disney” Fosters Media Literacy in Freshmen Full text
        3. Integrating Mathematics and the Language Arts Full text
      • Summer issue
        1. Leadership Preparation in Dangerous Times Full text
        2. Writing Under the Bodhi Tree Full text
        3. Integrating Music in History Education Full text
        4. The Mirror Crack’d-History Reflected by Hollywood Full text
      • Spring issue
        1. Caveats for Teaching the Novel Full text
        2. Teaching Citizenship through Service-Learning Full text
        3. Keeping the “Learning” in Service-Learning Full text
    • 2004
      • Winter issue
        1. Reflecting on Online Teaching and Learning Full text
        2. Trial by Fire: New Librarians as Team Teachers Full text
        3. The Best of Both Worlds: Teaching a Hybrid Course Full text
      • Fall issue
        1. The Quest for Meaning in Educational Research Full text
        2. Beginning a Team Journey of Discovery Full text
        3. Journal Writings of a School Psychologist Full text
      • Summer issue
        1. The War College Experience Full text
        2. An Instrument to Measure Mathematics Attitudes Full text
        3. Introducing Islam Through Qur’anic Recitation Full text
        4. The Cosmos Corner Full text
      • Spring issue
        1. Media and Theory Through the Writing Process Full text
        2. An Information Literacy Umbrella for Instruction Full text
        3. Factors Affecting Student Adoption of Online Education Full text
    • 2003
      • Winter issue
        1. A Novel Understanding of Ecology Full text
        2. Shared Insights from University Co-Teaching Full text
        3. Tapping Multiple Voices in Writing Center Assessment Full text
      • Fall issue
        1. Literature and International Relations: The Challenges of Interdisciplinarity Full text
        2. Building on Students’ Experiences in Teacher Education Full text
      • Summer issue
        1. Why Teachers Should Also Write Full text
        2. The Mind as a Novel Metaphor Full text
      • Spring issue
        1. Usage of Content in Web-Supported Academic Courses Full text
        2. Teaching Medical Informatics Online Full text
    • To cite, use print source rather than the above on-line versions which often do not reflect print copy format requirements or text lay-out and pagination. Use this form to order article copy.

    Editors’ Choice: full-text articles recognized for one or more of the following, examples from recent recommendations in no particular order:

    • demonstrates a useful practice that teachers from all disciplines would benefit from
    • describes classroom attitudes and behaviors from various perspectives
    • formulates a novel and interesting idea that appears to be a very effective teaching tool
    • illustrates ideas that can be applied to other disciplines and courses
    • offers succinct and clear style, enjoyable to read
    • provides exposition and explicating both sides of the issue
    • motivates teachers to rethink how they communicate directions and expectations
    • exemplifies current scholarly trends
    • deals with a significant, vital issue in education
    • adds to our knowledge of the challenges in helping ‘behind the times’ faculty
    • makes a significant original contribution to the field
    • contains elements which have general application
    • presents an innovative approach toward dealing with significant teaching issues

    Certainly all published submissions could satisfy one or more of the above criteria. However, at the end, a decision had to be made, select 2-4 articles out of 50-60 accepted for Editors’ Choice publication. To this effect, often, early submission (so encouraged by this journal) influences the outcome… Often, they are likely to become leading articles in a print edition (titles appear on journal’s cover). To read other full-text articles, see Readers’ Choice

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

  • stude

    [et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses Hero” _builder_version=”3.22″ use_background_color_gradient=”on” background_color_gradient_start=”#474ab6″ background_color_gradient_end=”#9271f6″ background_image=”http://chan.higher-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/coding-background-texture.jpg” background_blend=”overlay” custom_padding=”144px|0px|146px|0px||” animation_style=”slide” animation_direction=”top” animation_intensity_slide=”2%” locked=”off”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|||” custom_width_px=”1280px”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ header_font=”|on|||” header_font_size=”42px” header_line_height=”1.3em” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” text_orientation=”center” background_layout=”dark” max_width=”530px” module_alignment=”center” custom_padding=”|||” hover_enabled=”0″ header_font_size_tablet=”” header_font_size_phone=”” header_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” locked=”off” sticky_enabled=”0″]

    The ‘Good Teacher’ Question – a student perspective

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses” _builder_version=”3.22″ custom_padding=”0px|0px|100px|0px”][et_pb_row column_structure=”3_4,1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”46px|||||”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]

                   Daniel Sokol,  St Edmund Hall, Oxford University, United Kingdom

    'Where there is much desire to learn, there of necessity will be much 
    arguing, much writing, many opinions; for opinions in good men is but 
    knowledge in the making.'
                            --John Milton
    
    he epigram above goes a long way in providing an answer to this 
    oft-repeated question.  Of course, we must make a distinction between 
    Aristotle instructing passionate disciples on the definition of happiness 
    and a humble foreign language teacher attempting to familiarize a horde
    of boisterous adolescents to the intricacies of the English interrogative 
    sentence.  Whether adolescents back in the 4th century BC were radically 
    different in demeanor to today's is for the anthropologists and historians 
    to decide; in any case, Aristotle taught at his own establishment, the 
    Lyceum, which was populated with erudite and eager scholars, many of whom 
    had traveled great distances to study there.  Few would deny that a teacher 
    must teach according to his pupils.  Professor Stephen Hawking would explain 
    the concept of black holes to his Ph.D. student rather differently than
    he would to an inquiring GCSE student.  Nevertheless, there are a number
    of universal features that bind all first-rate teachers.  The astute but
    weary teacher would point to the first clause of the epigram and dismiss it
    as quixotic.  The even more astute good teacher would then explain where
    the fallacy lay: the desire to learn is not a precondition to successful 
    teaching, but a consequence.  The majority of students do not initially
    enter the classroom with a genuine desire to, say, describe a picture
    in English.  The teacher must instill it in them.  This is the most
    important task he faces and this is largely achieved by his own enthusiasm.  
    The teacher must be the most enthusiastic person in the room.  Enthusiasm
    is eerily contagious.
    
    Waiting for my first lecture on "Advanced Word Morphology" last year, I
    feared the worst.  The lecturer, a plump and immaculately dressed man, 
    stormed into the room and, from that moment on, never lost our attention.  
    To think that someone could be so excited about the irregular plurals
    in English was a little odd at first, but it nevertheless made us listen
    to find out what could induce such animated grimaces and gesticulations. 
    In the following week, the attendance doubled.  The good teacher then, has
    a veritable passion for what he teaches or, less romantic but equally 
    effective, can pretend to be.  To assume that a human being can be
    veritably fascinated by the prospect of describing a picture in English 
    would transcend the boundaries of good sense.  Once the teacher's enthusiasm
    has infused into the pores of his pupils, the more cerebral aspects of his 
    character come into play.  He must possess a sound knowledge of
    whatever he teaches and be ready to answer in a clear and persuasive manner 
    the arguments and opinions that Milton says will inevitably follow.  The 
    teacher-pupil interaction must be symbiotic, not merely a master-slave 
    relationship with the teacher acting as an all-knowing, infallible tyrant.  
    Patience is an important asset in a profession where abilities invariably 
    differ from pupil to pupil and remaining enthusiastic is by no means an
    easy task.  Related to patience is the ability to lucidly explain and 
    ungrudgingly reiterate aforementioned points.  No amount of enthusiasm
    will prevent some people from struggling with a concept or notion and thus
    the need for patience, tolerance, and clarity.
    
    The qualities described so far are universal and form a circle that 
    excludes all bad teachers but, naturally, also contains all the good
    ones.  Within that circle, diversity abounds.  One will find a good teacher
    whose humor and wit break the barriers between tedium and interest and retain
    the pupils' attention throughout the lesson.  Another teacher might break
    the same barrier by his sheer acting talent - by his pauses, gestures, 
    thought-provoking sentences, and bright pink sweater.  Another might
    use computers, word-games, and stickers to render the learning more
    compelling and engender enthusiasm.  Teaching is a creative profession and, 
    just like there are many ways to perform a Chopin ballad, there are many 
    ways to teach people English or any other subject.  Laboriously plowing 
    through a textbook will not make use of both the teacher's or pupil's 
    creative ability and the desire to learn will consequently vanish from both 
    parties.  The good teacher, by definition creative, will attempt to extract 
    the artistic elements of his pupils by his idiosyncratic variations on the
    repetitive nature of textbook learning.
    
    The first step towards reaching the elite group of good teachers - the
    galactic group to which Socrates, Cortot, and Bollettieri belong - is
    the inculcation of the "desire to learn."  Once this is achieved,
    knowledge, argumentative adroitness, clarity, patience, and creativity 
    are called upon. Only then will the teacher have secured a place in the 
    divisive circle and be proclaimed "a good teacher."
    

     

    Dear Educator:
    The Student Voice   welcomes students’ essays.
    The essays should deal with educational issues and be well written,
    discussing teaching, studying, homework, or any school-related topic
    of concern to students. These essays will be an opportunity to encourage
    students to write and be published, and they will give us, their teachers,
    a way of learning from them as well. The essays will not be edited.
    If you are interested in seeing one of your students’ essays published
    either in hard copy or online, please send me one or two essays that you
    would consider well done. The essays can be sent either in e-mail
    or as a Word attachment. Thank you.
    Dr. Ben Varner,   Associate Professor of English
    English Department,   University of Northern Colorado
    Greeley, CO 80631   USA

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

  • sp-ct

    [et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses Hero” _builder_version=”3.22″ use_background_color_gradient=”on” background_color_gradient_start=”#474ab6″ background_color_gradient_end=”#9271f6″ background_image=”http://chan.higher-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/coding-background-texture.jpg” background_blend=”overlay” custom_padding=”144px|0px|146px|0px||” animation_style=”slide” animation_direction=”top” animation_intensity_slide=”2%” locked=”off”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|||” custom_width_px=”1280px”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ header_font=”|on|||” header_font_size=”42px” header_line_height=”1.3em” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” text_orientation=”center” background_layout=”dark” max_width=”530px” module_alignment=”center” custom_padding=”|||” hover_enabled=”0″ header_font_size_tablet=”” header_font_size_phone=”” header_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” locked=”off” sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Executive Order 665 and Equal Access

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses” _builder_version=”3.22″ custom_padding=”0px|0px|100px|0px”][et_pb_row column_structure=”3_4,1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”46px|||||”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Phil Brocato, Ed.D. Student, University of Southern California

    Introduction
    According to the CSU (California State University), Title Wave II (babies of baby boomers) will increase a need for additional funding and space in its system.  So, in the fall of 1998, the CSU implemented EO 665 (Executive Order 665) to decrease remediation at its 23 campuses and prepare for Title Wave II.  The Office of Public Affairs of the CSU reported in November 1999 that CSU freshmen needing remedial classes dropped for the first time, supporting the notion that EO 665 is problem-free.  Could the unintended consequences of EO 665 be denial of access? In other words, does the differential impact of EO 665 deny access to students from low socio-economic areas and to those students who are the first in their family to go to college?  The Cal State University system was created to help the very students it may be systematically eliminating.

    What exactly is Executive Order 665?
    In short, Executive Order 665 is a determination of competence in English and mathematics.  This executive order applies to all students who enter the California State University in or after the fall term 1998.  In an effort to develop policy and improve competence, the Chancellor of the CSU appointed an Advisory Committee consisting of faculty and administration to make recommendations regarding entry level mathematics and English.  (Note:  There was no student representation on this committee.)  The following are its recommendations:

    Satisfying the ELM (entry level mathematics) or EPT (English placement test) is defined as the following:

    1. Qualifying for exemption from the ELM or EPT examination;
    2. Passing the ELM or EPT examination; or
    3. Taking the ELM or EPT examination and, in the event of not passing it, demonstrating competence by passing campus-approved programs/activities or by retaking the ELM or EPT examination.

    Transfer and first-time freshmen that do not qualify for exemption must satisfy ELM or EPT requirements by taking the test(s).  As described by the Advisory Committee, the student’s score will either exempt a student or require that the student take programs/activities (remedial classes) to satisfy the requirement(s).  In accordance with EO 665, each campus will set specific policies regarding re-testing and placement.  Of the CSU freshmen starting in 1999, 48% needed remedial classes in math and 46% in English, a decrease from students needing remediation in 1998.

    The CSU sees reducing remedial needs for its 359,000 students as a reduction in the amount of money spent on such courses.  Annually, the CSU spends about 10 million on remedial courses. If the goal of the CSU is reached by the year 2007, only 10 percent of entering freshmen will need remediation, which will reflect substantial savings in money and time for the system (Selingo A27).

    Unintended Consequences
    The CSU is legally required to accept students who meet certain criteria, e.g., a B average, satisfactory tests scores, and all required college-prep courses completed.  However, for certain urban campuses, the need for remediation among RAS (regular admissible students) is higher. For example, at California State University, Los Angeles, 70 percent of RAS are not adequately prepared by the K-12 system in their area and cannot pass the entry-level mathematics or English placement test, hence the need for remediation.  And, because there is a high correlation between college preparedness and socioeconomic status, such a policy perpetuates socioeconomic stagnation in areas where the K-12 system is weak.  Also, some CSU campuses are already at or will soon be at capacity.  So, if the CSU is to meet its projected goal of ten percent by 2007, it will have to either change admission policies or recruit higher achieving students to campuses before considering other applicants.  The net result of either tactic is lower socioeconomic status and urban students being displaced.  In addition, if students who need remediation are not accepted or retained by the CSU, how will excess capacity be used?  It is likely that students from more suburban areas where school systems are stronger and the need for remediation is less (those areas where campuses are already impacted) will travel to campuses with more space.  This pattern reinforces the correlation between low socioeconomic status and access to the CSU.  What are the alternatives?

    If community college is an alternative, where do the funds come from to pay for instructors and resources?  And we cannot forget to mention that community college students take, on an average, forty additional units to get a BA  This process is totally inefficient and creates a second-class student.  Instead, maybe the CSU should pay attention to social costs such as the number of students in higher education versus prison and whether or not education is an engine that drives social and economic mobility.  Yet, the CSU apparently feels confident in its efforts that go beyond the implementation of EO 665 to help students with remediation.  In fact, these efforts are worthwhile and do help students who are eager to go to college.  But what about those students who are told they do not qualify and must pass remedial classes or they will be dis-enrolled by the university?  Perhaps the CSU believes that by decreasing the need for remediation and enforcing EO 665, its twenty-three campuses will have additional monies to spend on qualified students. On the other hand, isn’t the possibility that remedial classes prepare students who might not otherwise get a chance to go to college-and, thus, increase their social and economic mobility-a good economic investment for the CSU? The implementation of EO 665 is a controversial effort by the CSU and has far reaching implications for minority students and those students who most often live in areas with underachieving primary and secondary schools and who are likely to be the first in their family to go to college.

    To ensure the CSU meets its projected goal, it has targeted 150 high schools statewide where they will offer “training workshops for high-school teachers, increase the number of college students who tutor in high schools, and give university-placement tests to high-school students in order to identify their weaknesses earlier” (Selingo, A27).  Funding for this project, in the sum of nine million dollars, came from the legislature and requires that high school teachers and college professors work together in an effort to reduce remediation.  But do professors and teachers get paid for their collaborative efforts?  If so, will the crux of their collaboration rely on getting students prepared to pass the either the ELM or EPT test?  If not, how dedicated will the teachers and professors be to the effort?  And, how much conflict will arise if a teacher or professor is told to work without pay?  It will take years to see results from these efforts.  Ten percent is not realistic for areas not well served by their K-12 and without aggressive education reform.  Meanwhile, in the fall of 1999, the CSU asked 1,440 students to leave the university to attend a community college and to pass remedial classes before returning.  Another 1,260 students felt a sense of rejection in their first year of college and chose never to return to the institution (Selingo A-27).

    Granted, reducing remediation does make professors’ lives a lot easier, but what about the student who chooses a life of crime because the student felt his/her desire and ability to learn did not meet the standard?  In 1998, it cost taxpayers $60,000 a year to incarcerate a young person and $8000 a year to educate that same young person.  It makes better sense to invest in education and livable wages, not in the prison system. Why not give students the extra push to succeed, instead of pushing them out the door?  CSU Presidents and Board of Trustees pride themselves on inclusivity (a term that includes all cultures), so why selectively eliminate cultures through EO 665?  Is there not great valued added to the system of education when students, who might not otherwise get a chance to go to college, do so and, subsequently, earn a degree?  But, when students who need remediation are the first to get the “boot,” the CSU is denying equal access.  The mix of cultures living in Los Angeles can be viewed as a microcosm of what a global society may one day look like; and likewise, if the CSU continues to invest in remediation, it too can be viewed as a culturally diverse microcosm within the institution of education

    Conclusion
    Should the CSU enforce EO 665 or educate students?  The K-12 partnership is unrealistic and will not reduce remediation to ten percent in six years.  Even the most ambitious education reform has failed to bring about the change in outcomes of student achievements, so why implement such a “tough-love” policy in one of the nation’s largest university systems? Savings in money and time are not justified by denying students an education for a circumstance out of their control.  Furthermore, the university measures success by the number of students it educates, not by how many it eliminates because their math and English skills are not up to par upon entering the university.  Educate the students; don’t punish them!

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

  • redfee

    [et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses Hero” _builder_version=”3.22″ use_background_color_gradient=”on” background_color_gradient_start=”#474ab6″ background_color_gradient_end=”#9271f6″ background_image=”http://chan.higher-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/coding-background-texture.jpg” background_blend=”overlay” custom_padding=”144px|0px|146px|0px||” animation_style=”slide” animation_direction=”top” animation_intensity_slide=”2%” locked=”off”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|||” custom_width_px=”1280px”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ header_font=”|on|||” header_font_size=”42px” header_line_height=”1.3em” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” text_orientation=”center” background_layout=”dark” max_width=”530px” module_alignment=”center” custom_padding=”|||” hover_enabled=”0″ header_font_size_tablet=”” header_font_size_phone=”” header_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” locked=”off” sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Why fees?

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses” _builder_version=”3.22″ custom_padding=”0px|0px|100px|0px”][et_pb_row column_structure=”3_4,1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”46px|||||”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Academic Exchange Quarterly is 100% self-supported.  There are 
    no sponsors or corporate owners.  Read acceptance rate NOTE
    Journal's publication expenses editing-production-distribution are
    covered by subscription fees, royalty payments, and redactory fees.
                  
    Academic Exchange Quarterly has optional redactory fees. You may 
    avoid paying by adhering to journal's procedure/requirements...
    even though journal's average administrative cost to process one 
    submission is around forty-five dollars. 
    
    Other journals have established mandatory fees like submission, 
    redactory, publication, processing or reprint fee. Rate varies, 
    see examples:
    
    - Economic Inquiry 
    	Oxford University Press 
    	$100 members, $160 nonmembers 
    - International Third World Studies Journal and Review 
    	University of Nebraska at Omaha
    	$45 fee 
    - Journal of Accounting Auditing and Finance
    	New York University
    	$125 fee 
    - Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures 
    	Syracuse University
    	$75 fee
    - Journal of Financial Economics 
    	University of Rochester @ Harvard University
    	$500 for subscribers, $550 for non-subscribers 
    	Referees are paid an honorarium out of the submission fee
    - Journal of Financial Education 
    	Villanova University 
    	$30 FEA members, $70 non-members 
    - Journal of Financial Markets
    	Yale School of Management
    	$170 
    	Used to defray the cost of having the paper refereed
    - Journal of Political Economy
    	University of Chicago Press 
    	$75 for subscribers, $125 for non-subscribers 
    	Submission fees are used to pay for refereeing services
    - Journal of Social Change and Critical Inquiry
    	University of Wollongong
    	$45 fee
    - Social Problems 
    	The University of California Press
    	$50 fee                                  
    

    May 2006

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

  • mo2538june

    [et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses Hero” _builder_version=”3.22″ use_background_color_gradient=”on” background_color_gradient_start=”#474ab6″ background_color_gradient_end=”#9271f6″ background_image=”http://chan.higher-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/coding-background-texture.jpg” background_blend=”overlay” custom_padding=”144px|0px|146px|0px||” animation_style=”slide” animation_direction=”top” animation_intensity_slide=”2%” locked=”off”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|||” custom_width_px=”1280px”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ header_font=”|on|||” header_font_size=”42px” header_line_height=”1.3em” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” text_orientation=”center” background_layout=”dark” max_width=”530px” module_alignment=”center” custom_padding=”|||” hover_enabled=”0″ header_font_size_tablet=”” header_font_size_phone=”” header_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” locked=”off” sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Social Issues in First-year College Writing

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses” _builder_version=”3.22″ custom_padding=”0px|0px|100px|0px”][et_pb_row column_structure=”3_4,1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”46px|||||”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Karen Peterson Welch, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire

    Karen Welch is Composition Director at a mid-sized liberal arts university. She earned a Ph.D in Composition Studies at the University of Minnesota.

    Abstract:  Many educators believe that including social and political issues in first-year college writing is an effective strategy for helping students learn to read, research, and write critically.  Others, however, argue that focusing on such controversial topics will distract students from the traditional goals of the course and sway them unwittingly toward the political ideologies of teachers or more articulate members of the class.  The challenge, therefore, is to help students use reading and writing to shape their own informed ideologies through thoughtful analyses of multiple perspectives and careful attention to reading and writing processes.

    Background 

    As teachers of college writing, we see many first-year students who are unaware of the complexities of the social and political issues that affect their lives.  We know that they know that the issues are “out there”—poverty, racism, homophobia, religious intolerance, sexism, and others—but we can wonder what they have learned about the pervasiveness of these issues, and from what perspectives.  If they are aware of the issues at all, that awareness might have come from family conversations, high school experiences, or—currently and often most persuasively for them—from television talk shows.  For these reasons, many composition professionals see the first-year composition course as an appropriate site for introducing students to the complexities of the social attitudes and policies that affect those issues.  This first college year is a milestone, a turning point, a new page with countless opportunities for reflection, growth, and change.  On many college campuses, first-year composition curricula include time devoted to college survival skills—assignments and activities that focus on the behavioral and intellectual growth expected of first-year students.  From this perspective, many practitioners argue that reading and writing assignments that dig more deeply into the complex causes and effects of poverty, racism, sexism, and the like provide important pathways to the equally important “survival skills” of critical thinking, scholarly research methods, and informed academic and civil discourse.

    Others, however, just as strongly assert that attention to controversial issues steers the curriculum away from its “primary goals” of writing instruction: practicing writing processes, writing effective academic prose, and applying to that prose the standard rules of English usage.  In fact, in “Narrating Conflict,” Patricia Harkin warns about a prevailing assumption within and beyond the academy that composition courses are “service courses” that should be designed to help students “with skills and drills, to overcome ‘faulty’ discursive practices” (279).  Furthermore, some academics (and many non-academics) believe that the teaching of writing should be a politically neutral process; that to grapple in first-year composition courses with issues such as welfare reform, reproductive rights, racial profiling, or ecological stability is to risk “indoctrinating” those who are, as Maxine Hairston described them, “grade-conscious students who will simply ‘parrot’ their instructors’ opinions on controversial issues” (“Required Writing Courses” 1).  Other professionals, on the other hand, argue that no education is politically neutral, and that to steer students away from social and political topics is to deny them opportunities to find their own stances and create their own dialectics in relation to those topics.

    These arguments about the place of social and political issues in first-year college writing courses constitute a microcosm of arguments concerning first-year college writing curriculum in general.  Increasingly, the goals and content of college writing instruction have come under fire from both academic and public sectors.  Some want writing curricula to include the study of canonical literary texts; others argue that all the world is text and that a writing curriculum, should recognize and study it as such.  Some assert the importance of teaching the conventions of academic discourse, while others see such a focus as furthering the pervasiveness of capitalistic hegemony.  These and other controversies have created significant paradigms that are continually changing the face of composition pedagogy.

    The Broader Controversy

    Composition professionals are not the only group expressing concern for college writing curricula.  Donald McQuade asserts that “composition studies remains one of the few academic disciplines in which outsiders insist on naming and authorizing its activities, without accepting the intellectual responsibility—and the institutional consequences—for doing so” (484).  In 1989, a debate over the content of first-year writing courses came to national attention when an English department committee at the University of Texas at Austin devised a writing course syllabus that “required students to read and write critically about ‘difference’ in the context of antidiscrimination law and discrimination suits” (Brodkey 236).  Linda Brodkey had hoped that the UT-Austin course would

    Convince some students to use writing critically; to identify, analyze, and produce arguments; and in so doing, to learn that the purpose of academic argument is not to discredit an adversary (as it often is in debates) but to arrive at, or construct, informed opinions about the profoundly complex and vexing social issues implied by difference. (239-40)

    When other department faculty and some administrators strongly resisted this proposed course as one that they felt constituted a liberal political agenda, the media and soon other composition professionals entered the debate, sparking a controversy that continues today about the expediency of including social and political issues in first-year college writing courses.

    The interdisciplinary nature of composition scholarship opens this controversy to rich discourse, now informed by a variety of pedagogical and theoretical perspectives; among them are voices from rhetorical, feminist, multicultural, critical, and literacy theorists.  Scholars in classical and modern rhetoric stress critical reading and thinking as ways for students to broaden their understanding of their own and other writers’ strategies, to draw insightful conclusions from what they read and write, and then to effectively convey those conclusions to their own readers.  Feminist, multicultural, and critical theorists remind us of the importance of students’ own experiences in the arena of their learning.  They focus on the effects of gender, race and ethnicity, economic class, sexual orientation, educational and religious background, and physical differences among others as important structures within students’ worldviews and ways of trusting their knowledge.  Literacy theorists as varied as E. D. Hirsch, Paulo Freire, and Mike Rose urge us to consider ways in which students construct that knowledge, and they assert a variety of sources from which it should or does evolve.  Such theorists present a maze of ideas about ways in which students approach all kinds of texts, and their diverse perspectives offer composition scholars an ever-broadening range of options for helping students see themselves as engaged readers, thinkers, and writers.  Within this theoretical framework is found not only a variety of opinions concerning the roles of first-year college writing instruction in general but also the shaping of an important discourse about the place of social and political issues within those curricula.

    While composition professionals might fall on either side of this argument, we still need to understand the concerns that some have about the ways in which students are introduced to social and political controversies in first-year writing courses.  A study of the literature can illuminate the validity of those concerns as well as the practices that breed them, but it also can affirm the importance of including those issues through responsible and reflective pedagogy.  Increasingly aware of the power of the media to shape our perceptions of current or historic events, I argue that we must encourage students to seek multiple perspectives on every issue.  Wary of the ways in which those with power benefit from the decisions (or lack of decisions) of the uninformed, I affirm our need to teach—not just require—students to draw well-supported conclusions from critical analyses of a variety of reliable sources.  As teachers of college writing, we are in an ideal place to help students recognize their own questions, explore their own biases, expose themselves to varied and multiple perspectives, and shape their own conclusions.  I contend, however, that to do this, we first need to become aware of our own biases and limitations and to acknowledge the influence of our backgrounds and experiences—not only on our ideologies, but on those of our students as well.

    In an article published in College Composition and Communication a few years after the UT-Austin incident, Maxine Hairston expressed her ongoing concern about the direction of first-year composition today:

    I see a new model emerging for freshman writing programs…that disturbs me greatly.  It’s a model that puts dogma before diversity, politics before craft, ideology before critical thinking, and the social goals of the teacher before the educational needs of the student.  It’s a regressive model that undermines the progress we’ve made in teaching writing, one that threatens to silence student voices and jeopardize the process-oriented, low-risk, student-centered classroom we’ve worked so hard to establish as the norm.  It’s a model that doesn’t take freshman English seriously in its own right but conceives of it as a tool, something to be used.  The new model envisions required writing courses as vehicles for social reform rather than as student-centered workshops designed to build students’ confidence and competence as writers.  It is a vision that echoes that old patronizing rationalization we’ve heard so many times before: students don’t have anything to write about so we have to give them topics.  Those topics used to be literary; now they’re political. (180)

    Hairston included examples from contemporary published articles to show the force of this trend and to challenge its assumptions.  She noted that she found similar sentiments in both “leaders in the profession and new voices” published in all of the field’s professional journals as well as in program descriptions of the 1988 MLA Convention and the 1991 CCCC.  She called to task a large number of well established writers in the field for what she saw as “contempt for their students’ values, preferences, or interests”(184) as well as for that of other teachers’ classroom goals and pedagogies (185).  After analyzing the theories and paradigm shifts that she believes have created such dangerous trends, she made her own recommendations for first-year writing courses: first, that they center on students’ own diverse experiences about which they feel more secure and informed; second, that students work collaboratively as a way to “decenter” and to foster “genuine multicultural growth”(190).  What Hairston did not acknowledge, though, is that both of those strategies require of students a heightened level of social and political consciousness so that they can move beyond “feel[ing] more secure and informed”; only then can they begin to experience “genuine multicultural growth.”

               

    In the introduction to their 1994 seminal work, Pedagogy in the Age of Politics, Patricia Sullivan and Donna Qualley affirmed my conviction that composition pedagogy has always been political.  In comparing the writing pedagogy of the 1960s with that of today, they note that while early expressivist teachers of writing such as Donald Murray, Peter Elbow, Ken Macrorie, and others urged personal writing “aimed at self-actualization,” our focus has shifted to “the sources of the self—the social, cultural, historical conditions by which selves, or ‘subjects,’ are formed, and which make particular acts of writing possible” (viii).  In Rhetorics, Poetics, and Cultures, James Berlin asserted that teaching strategies in writing classrooms may “unavoidably shape our students as ethical and social subjects,” and that this possibility more surely requires us to “take seriously our duty as public intellectuals inside and outside the classroom” (180).

               

    This focus on what we now call critical pedagogy continues to broaden and will, I believe, significantly shape college writing curricula well into the twenty-first century.  Hairston also argued that “Writing courses, especially required freshman courses, should not be for anything or about anything other than writing itself, and how one uses it to learn and think and communicate” (179).  And because I agree with part of Hairston’s premise—that first-year composition should “be about…how one uses writing to learn, think, and communicate”—my own composition pedagogy supports the inclusion of social and political issues.  Assignments that expose students to new and varied perspectives, that teach them to recognize the rhetorical significance of presenting those perspectives, that encourage them to “try on” multiple perspectives in light of their own value systems, and that then help them to effectively articulate how those perspective “fit” with their own seem to me to perfectly meet those important goals of learning, thinking, and communicating.

               

    Peter Caulfield draws an important link between those goals and that of critical pedagogy:

    Obviously, I am also trying to help those students become better writers.  Given my understanding of the relationship of thought and language, however, I am convinced that they cannot become better writers until and unless they also become better, more sophisticated, less solipsistic thinkers. (162)

    And this call to help students be more critical thinkers should address the concerns of  those within and outside of the academy that including social and political issues in the writing classroom “detracts” from the real goals of writing instruction.  Because writing instruction includes close reading, consideration of multiple perspectives, and careful articulation of writers’ own informed opinions and ideologies, including those issues seems a natural goal of writing pedagogy for young adults.

               

    Joseph Harris, in a recent article in CCC, advocates revision as one way to accomplish such a goal.  Recalling what some theorists call the “social turn” in writing pedagogy that occurred in the 1990s, Harris argues that we need to help students imagine revision as “a practice of making stronger use of the work of others and of more clearly articulating one’s own project as a writer” (591).  He warns against claming to know what is best for our students and instead to work with them to help them find their own voices and authority.  To do this, he recommends writing pedagogy that pays careful attention to “how ideas get shaped in and refracted by language…a focus not on form but on function, on use in context” (582).  He says, “The moment of revision, of going back to text, offers us the chance to ask students to rethink not just what they have to say but also what they are trying to do as writers” (588).  This focus on function—on a deliberate awareness of audience, purpose, and sources within and beyond their own experience—can effectively help student writers recognize, trust, and call upon their own informed authority.

               

    Conclusions

    Over the past few years, I have encountered an increasing number of students who appear to be at a stage of cognitive development in which they state a position quite strongly, but when asked to support it with reasons or evidence or examples, they seem able to only restate the position, not defend it.  For this reason, I am increasingly convinced that students at this level need to engage more fully in meaningful subjects, to practice more frequently and skillfully the processes of inquiry and analysis, and—as a bonus—to become better informed about the complexities and interrelatedness of the events, ideologies, and decisions that shape their world. 

               

    There seem to be few more appropriate venues for continuing (or sometimes beginning) this learning than in first-year college composition.  I am dismayed by the frequent and often unconscious references that I hear my students and colleagues make to “the real world” when referring to life after college; I want students to recognize that this world they are in now is no less real than the one they will inhabit after they graduate.  As citizens of this campus, city, state, country, and world, they are no less a part of its problems, complexities, and issues than they will be five, ten, or fifty years from now.  One way to help them see their connection to this “world” is to give them opportunities to explore—through sound writing pedagogy—the social and political issues that shape their world and to encourage them to begin now to study, interpret, and influence it in informed ways.

     

    References

     

    Berlin, James A.  “Rhetorics, Poetics, and Cultures:  Contested Boundaries in English Studies, “The Politics of Writing Instruction:  Postsecondary.  Eds., Richard Bullock and John Trimbur.  Portsmouth:  Boynton/Cook, 1991 (23-38)

    Brodkey, Linda.  “Making a Federal Case Out of Difference:  The Politics of Pedagogy, Publicity, and Postponement.” Writing Theory and Critical Theory.  Eds., John Clifford and John Schilb.  NY:  MLA, 1994 (236-61)

    Caulfield, Peter J.  “Classroom Materials.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 41.2 (1997): 162-8

    Elbow, Peter.  Embracing Contraries in the Teaching Process.  NY: Oxford UP, 1986

    Freire, Paulo.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed.  Trans.  Myra Bergman Ramos.  NY:  Seabury P, 1974

    Hairston, Maxine.  “Diversity, Ideology, and Teaching Writing.” CCC 43 (1992): 179-95

            “Required Writing Courses Should not Focus on Politically Charged Social Issues.”  Chronicle of Higher Education, 23 Jan., 1991:1+

    Harkin, Patricia.  “Narrating Conflict,” Clifford and Schilb 278-85

    Harris, Joseph.  “Revision as Critical Practice.”  College English 65.5 (July 2003):577-92

    Hirsch, E. D., Jr.  Cultural Literacy:  What Every American Needs to Know.  NY: Random, 1987

    Macrorie, Ken.  A Vulnerable Teacher.  Rochelle park, NJ:  Hayden book Co., 1974

    McQuade, Donald.  “Composition and Literary Studies.” Redrawing the Boundaries. Ed., Stephen Greenblatt and Giles Gunn.  NY:  MLA, 1992 (482-519)

    Murray, Donald.  A Writer Teaches Writing.  Boston:  Houghton Mifflin Company, 1968

    Rose, Mike.  Lives on the Boundary:  the Struggles and Achievements of American’s Unprepared.  NY: Free Press, 1989

    Sullivan, Patricia, and Donna Qualley, eds.  Pedagogy in the Age of Politics:  Writing and Reading (in) the Academy.  Urbana: NCTE, 1994

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

  • if-ju

    [et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses Hero” _builder_version=”3.22″ use_background_color_gradient=”on” background_color_gradient_start=”#474ab6″ background_color_gradient_end=”#9271f6″ background_image=”http://chan.higher-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/coding-background-texture.jpg” background_blend=”overlay” custom_padding=”144px|0px|146px|0px||” animation_style=”slide” animation_direction=”top” animation_intensity_slide=”2%” locked=”off”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|||” custom_width_px=”1280px”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ header_font=”|on|||” header_font_size=”42px” header_line_height=”1.3em” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” text_orientation=”center” background_layout=”dark” max_width=”530px” module_alignment=”center” custom_padding=”|||” hover_enabled=”0″ header_font_size_tablet=”” header_font_size_phone=”” header_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” locked=”off” sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Education is Not Found in a Book

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses” _builder_version=”3.22″ custom_padding=”0px|0px|100px|0px”][et_pb_row column_structure=”3_4,1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”46px|||||”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Melissa Penn   Student, USC

    hile baby-sitting my younger cousin Kelsey, I noticed that 
    she was frantically searching through a stack of books.  
    When I questioned what she was looking for she responded 
    frankly, "An education."  I had to laugh at such a childish 
    remark.  Many individuals believe that education is simply obtained 
    by reading books, listening to lectures or sitting in classrooms.  
    However, education is not received by being an active listener, or 
    an excellent reader.  College does not guarantee a higher education; 
    rather, it provides the atmosphere and tools that are required to 
    develop into an educated, and scholarly individual.  Education 
    therefore is achieved by progressing through the different stages 
    of knowledge, and acquiring the skills required to be an active 
    observer and participant in the real world.  
    
    Education is too often emphasized by the regurgitation of facts, 
    which diminishes the use of critical thinking.  There are too many 
    dualistic students in society today who think topologically.  That 
    is, they believe that there are only two different answers to every 
    question, the right one, and the wrong one.  This type of thinking 
    not only limits the quality of education that the student receives, 
    but it also exploits the teacher's indolence and insufficient ability 
    to bestow a higher education upon their students.  Although I was 
    ranked number four in my graduating class of 371 students, I do not 
    feel like I have received a higher education than the student who 
    was ranked number 371.  Why?  Simply because high school is equivalent 
    of a board game, one repeats what the teacher said, one's thinking is 
    emulative of the teachers, and one turns in the "busy work" on time.  
    Hence, high school has educated an individual on how to be resistant 
    to critical thinking.
    
    On the other hand, college professors attempt to make students think 
    critically about issues, which concern their lives, and the lives of 
    others.  A good college education is not bestowed to the students by 
    their professors; rather, the students furnish their own quality of 
    education.  A student can choose to remain resistant to critical 
    thinking, or the student can maneuver into the next stage of education, 
    which is thinking with multiple perspectives.  In this multiple stage, 
    the student begins to regard issues with diverse perspectives and to 
    consider multiple answers to questions (Mitchell, 2000).  In contrast 
    with high school, college encourages students to argue with the 
    decisions and claims of the professors.  Professors desire to encounter 
    contradictory views about specific topics, because professors realize 
    that the world is not dualistic.  Although the student is at first 
    aggravated, frustrated and overwhelmed by the rejection of dualistic 
    thinking, the student slowly learns to adapt to the recommendation of 
    critical thinking.  
    
    Despite being warned that college would be a major reality check, I 
    assumed that I would be able to succeed in college like I did in high 
    school.  I figured that I would be able to maintain good grades in 
    college without a struggle.  However, after experiencing my first year 
    at the University of Southern California, I have realized that receiving 
    a higher education is a serious and difficult task.  An education is not 
    something that a person can find in a book, or order in a catalogue.  
    In order to receive a higher education it is necessary that one apply 
    what he/she has learned in their classes to the real world.  This 
    application of knowledge will facilitate in comprehension of the 
    real world, and the social problems that ensconce the world.  I have 
    come to the conclusion that students must motivate themselves to learn 
    and to mature.  
    
    Moreover, college does not guarantee a higher education because it is 
    the student's responsibility to develop into a critical thinker.  
    Professors provide the tools to think critically, but it is the student 
    who teaches him/herself how to use these tools.  After the student 
    explores the tools that the teacher presents, he/she begins to identify 
    him/herself as a scholar, or as an immature student.  The scholars begin 
    to develop relative thinking perspectives, and examine how things work 
    in society.  These students do not condemn the critical challenges that 
    the professors present to them.  Instead, these students find it enjoyable 
    to discover how each part of the system fits together in order to make the 
    whole.  Thus, college does not only offer the opportunity to attain a 
    higher education, but college provides students with the opportunity to 
    discover who they are, what they represent, and what their goals are. 
    
    Similarly, college provides the opportunity for an individual to become 
    committed to a certain subject, and achieve a higher education.  College 
    cannot force students to take an active involvement in their educations.  
    However, college explores diverse subjects and allows students the 
    opportunity to develop an intimate relationship with what they are 
    learning.  For example, a student who is aroused by the contrasting views 
    about the cause of alcoholism may become completely devoted to the topic 
    and begin to involve himself or herself completely within the subject.  
    The student may begin to research the subject, read books and develop 
    their own ideas about the subject, without being told to do so.  An 
    individual with an active commitment to the growth and development of 
    his/her knowledge has achieved the highest of educations.  This individual 
    is prepared to change the world, and offer diverse views about life. 
      
    In essence, a higher education is achieved when an individual willingly 
    maneuvers through the different stages of knowledge.  In order for students 
    to receive a higher education it is necessary that they learn to think 
    critically and not topologically.  Although some may consider high school 
    as providing an adequate education, high school negatively encourages 
    dualistic thinking.  However, college is an institution that successfully 
    encourages students to think critically and influences them to develop 
    multiple perspectives on life.  I have found my first year of college to 
    be a valuable experience.  Not only have I been challenged to think 
    critically, but I have begun to develop alternative perspectives on life.  
    I look forward to receiving a higher education by using the tools provided 
    by my professors.
    

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

  • id

    [et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses Hero” _builder_version=”3.22″ use_background_color_gradient=”on” background_color_gradient_start=”#474ab6″ background_color_gradient_end=”#9271f6″ background_image=”http://chan.higher-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/coding-background-texture.jpg” background_blend=”overlay” custom_padding=”144px|0px|146px|0px||” animation_style=”slide” animation_direction=”top” animation_intensity_slide=”2%” locked=”off”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|||” custom_width_px=”1280px”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ header_font=”|on|||” header_font_size=”42px” header_line_height=”1.3em” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” text_orientation=”center” background_layout=”dark” max_width=”530px” module_alignment=”center” custom_padding=”|||” hover_enabled=”0″ header_font_size_tablet=”” header_font_size_phone=”” header_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” locked=”off” sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Sets, Steps and Ceilis: Irish Dancing

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses” _builder_version=”3.22″ custom_padding=”0px|0px|100px|0px”][et_pb_row column_structure=”3_4,1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”46px|||||”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]

                  Arthur Kingsland,  University of Newcastle, Australia

    rish dancing can be subdivided into Step Dancing, Ceili Dancing
    and Set Dancing.   The structural root of Irish  dance is found in 
    step dancing with solo performance, intricate and energetic footwork 
    and precise movements. The historical roots for Irish dancing lie in 
    the Ceili dance.  This article discusses these forms of dance briefly 
    and provides detail about the movements, music and footwork for Set 
    dancing. The "Sets" are a form of social dancing usually for four 
    couples arranged in the form of square "sets".  Examples of the 
    activities within the classes of Newcastle Irish Dance are used to 
    illustrate various points. 
    
    Step dancing
    A number of historic influences served to suppress Irish dancing and
    other aspects of the Irish culture from the 14th century. Penal Laws
    enacted in the late 17th century sent Irish culture underground.
    These laws included the banning of education of Catholic children
    and led to the creation of hidden (hedge) schools. Irish dance
    continued during this period of intense repression - albeit in secret.
    Dance Masters appeared in the mid-18th century (Haurin & Richens
    1996). The dance teachers traveled from town to town spending
    some time in each teaching dance in kitchens, farm outbuildings, at
    cross roads, hedge schools, etc. Each dance master had a repertoire
    of dance steps and created new steps over time (Haurin & Richens
    1996). Sometimes the dance masters competed at feisianna, the
    winner being the one who knew the most steps. In Irish dancing a
    "step" is eight measures or bars of music. These men were the
    creators of set and ceili dances and created schools of dancing - the
    precursors of those we see today.
    
    In 1893 the Gaelic League (Conradh na Gaeilge) was formed to help
    the revival of Irish culture. In 1929 the Irish Dancing Commission
    (An Coimisiun le Rinci' Gaeliacha) was formed to establish rules for
    teaching, judging and competitions for step and ceili dancing (Haurin
    & Richens 1996; Murphy 1995:31-33).
    
    This standardization means that the form of Irish dancing known as
    Step Dancing uses Set Step Dances (usually just called "Set
    Dances") where the dance contains specific foot movements and
    sequences to specific set musical pieces. Poise, posture, hand, back,
    leg and foot position and use of stage are all considered in addition
    to the expectation that the steps will be in accordance with the
    requirements for the specific set dance. Individual interpretation is in
    terms of the skills of performing the set steps. Instead of the
    conventional 8-bar structure used mainly in social dancing, the set
    dance tunes have a one or two part structure with 8 or 12 bars in the
    first part and 12, 14, 16 or more bars in the second part (Rince Ceol
    Amhrán 1997).
    
    Ceili Dancing
    Ceili dances come from the informal tradition of dances evolving
    through time as is seen in most cultures (Rince Ceol Amhrán 1997).
    Ceili dances take a number of forms as round dances, line dances,
    progressive line dances. Many modern ceili dances have known
    authors courtesy of the efforts of the Irish Dancing Commission.
    
    A "Ceili" has a number of meanings depending on which Celtic
    grouping is being considered. In the context of Irish dancing a ceili
    is a gathering with music, song and dancing and participation by all
    those attending.
    
    Set Dancing
    The Sets or Country Set Dancing is social dancing usually in the form
    of square "sets" comprised four couples one on each side of the
    square. Irish set dances evolved from a combination of the footwork
    and movements of the step and ceili dances and the French
    Quadrilles or court dances of the 18th and 19th century. These
    dances were brought to Ireland and taught by the early dance
    masters. They were adapted to traditional Irish music and modified
    and elaborated to show off the dancers' prowess.
    
    Each dance is comprised of several figures (usually 5 or 6, but
    ranging from 2 to 9) set to traditional Irish tunes such as reels, jigs,
    polkas or hornpipes. The footwork ranges from simple stepping to
    fast battering steps, but generally the foot is relatively flat avoiding
    the leaps and travelling of the other forms of dancing. In set dancing
    you dance with your partner, yet in each figure each couple also
    dances with one or more of the other couples in the set. The sets are
    the only form of Irish dancing that retain the strong regional identity
    with differences in the types of tunes used and differences in the
    type of footwork.
    
    While Step dancing requires considerable fitness and agility almost
    anyone can participate in set dancing. A certain amount of stamina is
    required but simplifying the footwork and shortening the distance
    traveled when progressing can make a large difference to the
    amount of energy expended. 

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

  • edpstan

    [et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses Hero” _builder_version=”3.22″ use_background_color_gradient=”on” background_color_gradient_start=”#474ab6″ background_color_gradient_end=”#9271f6″ background_image=”http://chan.higher-ed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/coding-background-texture.jpg” background_blend=”overlay” custom_padding=”144px|0px|146px|0px||” animation_style=”slide” animation_direction=”top” animation_intensity_slide=”2%” locked=”off”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”3.25″ background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” custom_margin=”|||” custom_width_px=”1280px”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”3.25″ custom_padding=”|||” custom_padding__hover=”|||”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ header_font=”|on|||” header_font_size=”42px” header_line_height=”1.3em” background_size=”initial” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” text_orientation=”center” background_layout=”dark” max_width=”530px” module_alignment=”center” custom_padding=”|||” hover_enabled=”0″ header_font_size_tablet=”” header_font_size_phone=”” header_font_size_last_edited=”on|desktop” locked=”off” sticky_enabled=”0″]

    Kristin K. Stang, PhD, Academic Exchange Quarterly Feature Editor,

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ admin_label=”Courses” _builder_version=”3.22″ custom_padding=”0px|0px|100px|0px”][et_pb_row column_structure=”3_4,1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default” custom_padding=”46px|||||”][et_pb_column type=”3_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.6.0″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]

    is Assistant Professor Department of Special Education, at California State University, Fullerton
    E-mail: kstang@fullerton.edu

    Collaboration and Consultation in Education
    Educational Assessment

    Academic Exchange Quarterly:
    | forthcoming issues | submission guidelines | mentoring program | editorial board | become a reviewer | become issue editor | how to subscribe | home |

    April 2004

    [/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_4″ _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_sidebar _builder_version=”4.5.6″ _module_preset=”default”][/et_pb_sidebar][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]